*Please Note: The intention of this artwork is to raise awareness about the negative impacts of stereotypes, Xenophobia and racial predjudice. Viewer discretion is advised.


This 10ft by 3ft sculpture invites us to delve into the complexities of class-based societal dynamics, race relations, and the perpetuation of negative stereotypes.

It immerses us in a disturbing tableau of humanity's darkest traits, daring us to examine the consequences of unchecked prejudice, intolerance, and ignorance.


Love thy Neighbour transcends the boundaries of political correctness and demands that we challenge the current cultural paradigm shift. Will a more just and ardent society emerge if we cease to divide society through the monetization of hate and begin to divide them through the moentization of pseudo equity and corporate social jusitce? The sanitization of the past will not disenfect the future. Sadly those who do not know the past they will be condemmed to repeat it.

This artwork serves as a catalyst for introspection, urging us to question the origins and motivations behind the stereotypes we encounter. By examining these stereotypes with nuance and sensitivity, we create an environment that fosters dialogue and encourages us to challenge our own beliefs. In conclusion, it is vital to resist the urge to censor or restrict access to challenging ideas simply based on personal discomfort. By embracing intellectual freedom, we celebrate the diversity of perspectives that contribute to our societal fabric.

Critics have raised concerns about the perpetuation of harmful narratives in this artwork, and I appreciate their perspectives. However, I firmly believe in the power of intellectual freedom and the necessity of engaging in open discourse.

By amplifying these uncomfortable narratives, the artist sheds light on the consequences of our collective failure to embrace diversity and dismantle harmful stereotypes.


While some argue against challenging societal norms without considering the potential harm caused by triggering trauma for survivors of the depicted stereotypes or exacerbating existing prejudices, I believe it is crucial to recognize and not deny the spectrum of ideas that permeate our society.

While we should take into account the emotional well-being and safety of individuals who have historically faced discrimination and stereotypes, it should not be used as a tool to suppress the expression of artists.


If we prioritize individual sensitivities and engage in censorship based on cultural concerns, we risk falling into a state similar to countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia, where art is heavily censored and freedom of expression is severely restricted. In a liberal democracies there should be no fear of retribuion when it comes to using our imagination to create images or construct sentences.


Artists should strive to create work that fosters dialogue and understanding, while also recognizing the potential harm that can be caused by perpetuating harmful narratives.

However, it is not the artist’s responsibility to be concerned with the fragile sensibilities held by certain viewers. It is through thoughtful and responsible artistic expression, free from the constraints of dogmatic ideological frameworks, that we can truly challenge societal norms and promote positive change.

Censorship and digital puritanism should never be allowed to stifle creative expression. It is crucial to reject the authoritarian impulses that can be seen within corporations, governments, institutional bureaucracies, and activist groups. Instead, we should embrace intellectual freedom and encourage open discourse, allowing for the flourishing of diverse ideas and perspectives. By upholding this standard, we can push the boundaries, challenge prevailing norms, and foster a more inclusive and enlightened society.